Author name: cdc.dtw

“There are two versions of the UCDP Battle-related Deaths Dataset (BRD), depending on the unit of analysis (resolution) employed. As such, there is:1. a dyadic version, where each individual conflict dyad (pair of two fighting actors) has its own individual entry in each year the conflict dyad was active; Thus, each entry contains a single […]

“This document describes the Non-State Conflict Dataset, a project within the Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP) at the Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University. The UCDP Non-State conflict project has been developed with support from the Human Security Report Project, Simon Fraser University, in Vancouver, Canada.” (codebook, p. 3) I/ Conflict variableI/1/ Unit

“This document describes the One-sided Violence Dataset, a project within the Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP) at the Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University. The UCDP One-sided violence project has been developed with support from the Human Security Report Project, Simon Fraser University, in Vancouver, Canada.” (codebook, p. 3) I/ Conflict variableI/1/ Unit

“The UCDP Dyadic dataset builds on the UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict dataset, but goes beyond the conflict level and focuses on dyads within each conflict. As such, it constitutes a disaggregated version of the UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict dataset. It is compatible with a range of other datasets, both provided by UCDP and by PRIO (International Peace

“This document describes the UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict Dataset, a joint project between the Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP) at the Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University and the Centre for the Study of Civil War at the International Peace Research Institute in Oslo (PRIO). […]Both UCDP and PRIO offer a range of other

“The Correlates of War (COW) Project has utilized a classification of wars that is based upon the status of territorial entities, in particular focusing on those that are classified as members of the inter-state system (referred to as “states”). Wars have been categorized by whether they primarily take place between/among states, between/among a state(s) and

“The dyadic war dataset is built and fully compatible with the dyadic MID dataset (Maoz et al. 2019). It provides dyadic records of interstate wars over the period of 1816-2010, with a dyad-year unit of analysis. The dataset contains several innovations and changes compared to the war or MID datasets.” (codebook, p. 1) I/ Conflict

“The Correlates of War (COW) Project has utilized a classification of wars that is based upon the status of territorial entities, in particular focusing on those that are classified as members of the inter-state system (referred to as “states”). Wars have been categorized by whether they primarily take place between/among states, between/among a state(s) and

“The Intra-state Dataset v4.0 was released with the other updated war data (inter-state war, extra-state war, and non-state war) in Resort to War: A Data Guide to Inter-State, Extra-State, Intra-state, and Non-State Wars, 1816-2007 by Meredith Reid Sarkees and Frank Whelon Wayman.[…] A second publication focusing upon only the intra-state wars (dataset v5.0) was published

“The Intra-state Dataset v4.0 was released with the other updated war data (inter-state war, extra-state war, and non-state war) in Resort to War: A Data Guide to Inter-State, Extra-State, Intra-state, and Non-State Wars, 1816-2007 by Meredith Reid Sarkees and Frank Whelon Wayman.[…] A second publication focusing upon only the intra-state wars (dataset v5.0) was published